I was attracted to this work because Steinbeck loosely bases its structure on the Arthurian tales. But ever so loosely . . . here, flashes of gallantry and charity exist, but are oft subsumed by the gang's overriding self-absorption. Danny is the anti-Arthur, in a way, leading a band of ragtag ne'er-do-wells in endless self-indulgence and debauchery. The tale meandered but was humorous (it was satirical in places). I think the point was showing the pointlessness of such living . . . or maybe it was a lens into Depression-era society in Steinbeck's area of origin. I enjoyed it well enough, but not as much as I hoped.
Rating: B
Rating: B
No comments:
Post a Comment