Thursday, February 27, 2020

Hessische Sagen für Kinder (Elke Leger)


Hessische Sagen für Kinder is a collection of 23 fairy tales based in towns in the German state of Hessen.  Some originally appeared in Brothers Grimm (in 1816); others were adapted from other collections.

The tales themselves were okay; the watercolors were nice. What makes this appealing is the familiar locations mentioned- many of the stories reference buildings or features that can still be seen in the towns today if you know where to look.  That was fun.  As this was in German, it took me a long time to get through the 120 pages.  The back says it's suitable for children from 10 years old; my German must not be as good as I thought, as I really struggled through parts.  Overall, it's a nice read if you live in the area and want to learn some interesting local legends.

Rating: B+

Sunday, February 23, 2020

The Elder (Cornelis Van Dam)


The Elder looks at this important office in both the Old Testament and New Testament eras.

In the Bible, you'll see mention of 'elders.'  In Presbyterian churches, there is (at least) one teaching elder (a pastor) and several ruling elders.  "An elder is called an office bearer . . . [and] an ecclesiastical office can be defined as a task given by God for a specific continuous and institutional service to his congregation with a view to its edification."  In general, an elder is to preserve and nurture life in covenant with God, which is characterized by serving.  They provide comfort, correction, nurture, hope, teaching, protection, and leadership of the congregation they serve.  They are "to be wise, understanding, and respected," and exhibit a "heart and love for God's people and their needs, as a shepherd does for his sheep."  They work "to restore peace to the community by judging rightly."  They're entrusted to pass on the riches of the gospel, as the ultimate task is "to point to Christ." Understandably, "the Word of God is central in the task of the elder shepherds in leading, gathering, and nurturing the flock."

"All these are awesome duties and expectations.  No wonder that the requirements for office are very high- a godly life, excellent knowledge of Scripture, and a genuine love for the sheep.  Elders must constantly seek to cultivate these virtues."   These things are impossible in our own strength, but "The Christ who gives the offices also enables with his Spirit those who serve his congregation."  As a friend told me, "The task is impossible, in our own ability, and it is crushing, in our own strength, and it is lonely, in our own pursuit."

This book was a mixed bag for me.  There's nothing wrong with it- it is a good reference pointing to all the scriptural mentions of eldership and explaining the office functions.  That said, it seemed overly repetitive (like he was saying the same thing multiple ways over and over).  It was also difficult for me to focus while reading this- I couldn't tell if it was the writing style, font choice, or just my own mental distractions.  It's a good resource, not just for elders but for any thinking of leadership in any organization.  All leaders, in my opinion, should exhibit qualities expected of elders.

Rating: B

Tuesday, February 18, 2020

Iron Kingdom (Christopher Clark)


Iron Kingdom is about the rise and downfall of Prussia, that central German state so central in Germany's unification (and, some argue, its downfall in both World Wars).  All quotes presented are from the book.

Summary
It started with Brandenburg, a small territory surrounding Berlin.  The Hohenzollerns, a south German family on the rise, purchased this land in 1417.  In so doing, they also gained power, as Brandenburg was one of the seven Electorates of the Holy Roman Empire ("a patchwork quilt of states and statelets that extended across German Europe" . . . that was "a loose fabric of constitutional arrangements centred on the imperial court and encompassing over 300 sovereign territorial entities that varied widely in size and legal status").  Thus, Frederick Hohenzollern became Frederick I, Elector of Brandenburg, one of the seven "with the right to elect the man who would become Holy Roman Emperor of the German Nation."

An Elector had tremendous power.  And in the subsequent centuries, the Brandenburg territory would add patches of land to the east and west through a combination of advantageous marriages (with relatives dying without issue) and concessions granted in exchange for the Electoral vote.  Ducal Prussia- a small tract of land now Russian- was incorporated into Brandenburg in 1618.  It would eventually lend its name to the entire territory.

Unfortunately, disaster awaited.  "During the Thirty Years War (1618-48) the German lands became the theatre of a European catastrophe.  A confrontation between the Hapsburg Emperor Ferdinand II and Protestant forces within the Holy Roman Empire expanded to involve Denmark, Sweden, Spain, the Dutch Republic and France.  Conflicts that were continental in scope played themselves out on the territories of the German states: the struggle between Spain and the breakaway Dutch Republic, a competition among the northern powers for control of the Baltic, and the traditional great-power rivalry between Bourbon France and the Habsburgs.  Although there were battles, sieges and military occupations elsewhere, the bulk of the fighting took place in the German lands.  For unprotected, landlocked Brandenburg, the war was a disaster that exposed every weakness of the Electoral state."

But they would recover.  After the war, "Brandenburg's resurgence in the second half of the seventeenth century appears remarkable . . . [it] was a substantial regional power on a par with Bavaria and Saxony, a sought-after ally and a significant element in major peace settlements.  The man who presided over this transformation was Frederick William, known as the 'Great Elector'."

The Elector was focused on building his army to "restore the independence of his territory and press home his claims."  "But the army was just one factor in Brandenburg's recovery and expansion after 1640," as "Frederick William was able to secure major territorial gains simply by playing the international system."  France and Sweden helped him obtain eastern Pomerania and other areas.  The result? "At the close of the seventeenth century, Brandenburg-Prussia was the largest German principality after Austria.  Its long scatter of territories stretched like an uneven line of stepping-stones from the Rhineland to the eastern Baltic.  Much of what had been promised in the marriage and inheritance contracts of the sixteenth century had now bee made real."  "Prussia's ascent began with the reign of the Great Elector," according to his great-grandson Frederick the Great.  (From 1640-1797, there was "not a single reign in which territorial gains were not realized.")

The territory was still known as Brandenburg- but then came a crown.  "From 1660, Frederick William was the sovereign ruler of Ducal Prussia."  He was now a European prince . . . and during his successor's reign, in 1701, "the Ducal Prussia sovereignty would be used to acquire the title of king for the House of Hollenzollern."  Elector Frederick III was crowned 'King in Prussia.' (the title was allowed by Austria because it needed Prussia's support).  "In due course, even the ancient and venerable name of Brandenburg would be overshadowed by 'Kingdom of Prussia', the name increasingly used in the eighteenth century for the totality of the northern Hohenzollern lands." Prussia had arrived [the term would be formally adopted in 1807].

Though strong, Brandenburg-Prussia felt vulnerable based on its location . . . the trauma of the Thirty Years War would create a "restless activism that would become a hallmark of Prussian foreign policy."  In this and later conflicts, Brandenburg would find itself located at the intersection of the main lines of conflict in Europe.  As a result, Berlin became known for oscillating between options, choosing "between alliance, armed neutrality, and independent action."  They needed to be on good terms with France, Austria, Poland, Sweden, Russia . . .   So they followed a pendulum policy.  "Playing the system effectively meant being on the right side at the right moment, and this in turn implied a readiness to switch allegiances when an existing commitment became burdensome or inopportune."  In addition, successive rulers would make the military (which was "out of proportion to its population and economic capabilities") and development of domestic industry central objectives.

Prussia would continue to grow. In 1740, Frederick II invaded (and conquered) Silesia, the acquisition of which "changed permanently the political balance within the Holy Roman Empire and thrust Prussia into a dangerous new world of great-power politics."  He was able to take it from an Austria exhausted by other conflicts, "and its annexation would bring to the Prussian lands an element of productive intensity that they had hitherto lacked."  This was big. "For the first time, a lesser German principality had successfully challenged Habsburg primacy within the Empire to place itself on an equal footing with Vienna."  "The annexation of Silesia provided Prussia not only with money, produce and subjects, but also with a broad corridor of land extending from the Brandenburg heartland straight to the margins of Habsburg Bohemia, Moravia and the Austrian hereditary lands."  "For the first time, the political life of the Empire began to orient itself around a bipolar balance of power.  The era of Austro-Prussian 'dualism' had begun."  Prussia would solidify itself in the Seven Years' War (1756-83), overcoming against both France and Austria.  They would subsequently acquire parts of Poland during three partitions of the country (1772-1795), splitting it with Russia.  But the French were coming.

Napoleon took Europe by storm- including Prussia.  Major defeats in 1806 (at Jena-Auerstedt) would lead to French subjugation and shock Prussia into transformation.  The country would spend the next few years working to re-establish itself as autonomous power.  The French re-partitioned Germany, taking territories in the west from Prussia but granting them some in the east.  Based on these territorial reorganizations, "the basic outlines of a simplified nineteenth-century Germany were already visible."

Prussia would get their revenge at the Battle of Leipzig in 1813,  "the greatest single military engagement to that date in the history of continental Europe, and probably of human warfare."  It was a decisive Napoleon defeat, bringing "to a close his dominion in Germany."  Prussia re-emerged from the humiliation imposed at Tilsit [where the peace treaty was signed] in 1807."  How?  They improved the military quality of command and used new strategies, aiming to destroy forces and capacity for making war (as outlined by Clausewitz in his famous work, On War).  This victory was later considered a moment of liberation in German history.

Napoleon had lost, and the map of Europe was re-drawn. "The territorial settlements agreed at the Vienna Peace Congress of 1814-15 created a new Europe."  Prussia traded some territory with the Russians, and "the Hohenzollern kingdom was now a colossus that stretched across the north of Germany  . . ."  They reinforced their presence in German Europe by accepting territory in the 'west' and giving up some Polish land.  They then dominated in the surrounding German-speaking lands through "customs harmonization and federal security policy."  Though the southern states (Baden, Württemberg, and Bavaria) didn't trust them, Prussia excelled at "harnessing [German] national enthusiasms to its own interests."  There were hints at a forthcoming unified Germany.

The time was approaching.  "1848 was the year of the nationalists.  Across Europe, the political and social upheavals of the revolution were intertwined with national aspirations."  But "nationalism was subversive because in many parts of Europe, the realization of the national vision implied fundamental transformations of the political map."  It "implied the political disintegration of the Habsburg monarchy," but was integrative in Germany, aiming to create "a putatively single German fatherland."

"The German question was ultimately a European question.  It could not be addressed (let alone resolved) in isolation."  Why?  Because German unity "would require a fundamental change in the power-political constellation of Europe."

Austria had dominated German-speaking affairs for centuries; how did they respond to talks of unifying?  There was a 'greater-German' solution that incorporated them, but they wouldn't have it, so things "shifted in the direction of the 'lesser-German' solution . . . [where] Austria would be excluded from the new national polity, [and] pre-eminence within . . . would pass . . . to Prussia."  Didn't work initially- not all states were keen to join.  But soon, Prussia 'began playing a leading role in German affairs."  But there was work to do.

In 1862, to assuage the political unrest, the king appointed Otto von Bismarck to the minister-presidency of Prussia.  "Bismarck was not a man of principle; he is better described as the man of detachment from principle, the man who . . . practise[d] a new kind of politics, flexible, pragmatic, emancipated from fixed ideological commitments."  He "never behaved as if he had a boss."  He was aggressive and shrewd, and "to meet the challenges of a more aggressive German policy, Prussia needed a flexible and highly effective military instrument."

Military was essential.  Victories in Denmark (1864) and against an Austro-German alliance (Austro-Prussian War, 1866) enabled Prussia to create a new German Confederation.  "With the victory of 1866, the long history of Prussia's contest with Austia for hegemony over Germany came to an end."  Prussia now had everything except Baden, Württemberg, Hesse-Darmstadt, and Bavaria.  France declared war, but a giant German victory at Sedan (1870) eventually proved crippling.  Bismarck secured the southern states in a union, unifying them in 1871, when "a new German Empire was proclaimed in the Hall of Mirrors at the Palace of Versailles."  King William I becamse German Emperor 170 years to the day after Frederick I was coronated as Prussian King.  In summary, by 1871, "the Kingdom of Prussia had reinvigorated its armed forces, driven Austria out of Germany, destroyed the military might of France, built a new nation-state and transformed the European balance of power in a burst of political and military energy that astonished the world."

Europe had changed. "For centuries, Europe's German centre had been politically fragmented and weak.  The continent was dominated by the states on its periphery, whose interest was to maintain the power vacuum at the centre.  Now, however, for the first time, the centre was united and strong.  Austria-Hungary became Germany's junior ally.  And "Germany was unified under Prussian leadership."  Not surprisingly, "the military was woven deeply into the fabric of everyday life after 1871."  But in Prussia, the Emperor, not parliament, controlled the military.  This would cause great strife.

World War I was on the horizon.  Germany would encourage Austria to invade the Balkans after Archduke Franz Ferdinand's assassination, and a chain-reaction set in place by alliances on both sides would soon have the world at war.  Germany would lose- the Kaiser William abdicated in 1918.  Though reduced in size and importance, Prussia survived WWI.  It remained the dominant state in German affairs.

World War II was soon in coming.  The Nazis celebrated 'Prussiandom,' cementing Prussia's legacy in an unfortunate way.  "Nazi-Prussia was a glittering fetish assembled from fragments of a legendary past.  It was a manufactured memory, a talismanic adornment to the pretensions of the regime."  The Nazis focused on loyalty and obedience, looking to Prussian characteristics, but these qualities were "severed from their ethical and religious roots."  Yet "in the end, it was the Nazi view of Prussia that prevailed.  The western allies needed no persuading that Nazism was merely the latest manifestation of Prussianism."  After Germany's defeat in 1945, Prussia would be deliberately and completely dissolved by the victorious allies (it was formally abolished by law in 1947).  Millions of Germans left or were expelled from the historical Prussian lands.  Königsberg- the most important city in Ducal Prussia- would become Soviet Kaliningrad (it remains so this day, an island of Russian sovereignty next to Poland).  Statues were destroyed or buried.  Prussia, as an identity, was deliberately erased from public memory.  The Iron Kingdom had fallen.

Review
This is very specifically a history of Prussia.  Major events like World Wars I and II were glanced over (not even summarized).  The author discusses cultural attributes of various monarchs, the role religious confessions played, societal tendencies, governmental structures, and many other things.  The book was informative and enlightening.  The writing was outstanding, and the perspective seemed fair.  Nowadays, of course, the concept of 'Prussia' is synonymous with a militaristic, chauvinist, aggressive inclination exemplified by the Nazis.  As always, the truth is more complex and nuanced than popular simplifications portray, and Clark did a good job looking at the positive elements of Prussian society (like its outstanding educational system, "more principled commitment to tolerance," frequent "pragmatic and flexible governance," and pioneering social legislation).  Overall, it looks like several key figures (Bismarck, Hindenburg, and several dominant or capitulating Kaisers) drove this patchwork territory- and Germany along with it- into twentieth century ruin. A good, if sobering, read.

Rating: A-

P.S. The book has a series of helpful maps; most specifically, six at the beginning that show Prussia's growth through the centuries.  You can view those maps here.

P.P.S. In 1817, students gathered in Wartburg to celebrate the 300th anniversary of the Reformation and 4th of the Battle of Leipzig.  They adopted the black/red/gold colors of the Lützow volunteer corps flag, and some claim today's German tricolor would be born from this.

Monday, February 17, 2020

Hidden Figures


Hidden Figures is the story of three African-American women (Katherine Johnson, Dorothy Vaughan, and Mary Jackson), all extremely gifted in math, who worked for NASA during the beginning of the space race and helped John Glenn into orbit.  Being in 1960's America, they did so in the face of overt and heartbreaking discrimination.  But they would persevere and each have impressive careers, being the first African-American women in several areas (as a NASA supervisor, to graduate in Aeronautical engineering, and more).

This was a fantastic movie, poignant and inspiring.  Highly recommended.

Rating: A


Tuesday, February 11, 2020

The Two Popes


The Two Popes is a Netflix biographical movie about Pope Benedict (who abdicated in 2013) and current Pope Francis (back when he was a Cardinal).  It examines their differences (in belief and leadership style) and how they ultimately came to appreciate each other.

The acting here was outstanding.  The story was good, though it's hard to judge how historically accurate it is (much of the movie is private dialogue between the two men- which must require a good amount of speculation).  It's a movie based on a play based on the true event . . . so I suspect much license.  Still, abdication of a papacy is rare (before Benedict, it had been last done ~600 years prior), and it was interesting to see that played out, and how even religious men of authority struggle with doubts and personal sins. 

Rating: A-

Monday, February 10, 2020

Kill Doctor Lucky


Today's review is of the 1996 release, Kill Doctor Lucky.  For 3-8 players, it takes 45 minutes.

Overview
You've had it.  You cannot stand Doctor Lucky, so you're going to take him out.  The problem is, everyone else wants to get him first.  Your hatred runs so deep, though, only the one who kills him truly wins.  So it's going to be you.

In Kill Doctor Lucky, your goal is to . . . do as the title says.  Everyone starts with a hand of cards and a pawn in the [foyer].  Most rooms are named and numbered, some are only named, and some aren't given either.  On your turn, you:
- make a free move (to an adjacent room)
- optional: play card[s] which allow you to move yourself or move Doctor Lucky
- optional: make a murder attempt on Doctor Lucky (if you're in the same room AND out of line of sight of all other players' pawns)
- draw a card (only if you didn't play cards this turn AND didn't make a murder attempt AND are in a named/numbered room)

To make a murder attempt, you [optionally] play a murder weapon card that boosts your chances.  Your total value on the attempt = number of spite tokens + (number on the weapon card OR 1).  Then, every other player (in clockwise order) can play 'failure' cards, valued 1-3.  Once the total value meets your murder attempt value, your attempt fails and you get a spite token.
the board; image from here
After your turn, Doctor Lucky automatically moves to the next named and numbered room (ignoring unnumbered rooms and unnamed ones).  The rooms are numbered 0-18; once he gets to the end, he starts again at 0.  The turns progress until someone makes an attempt that doesn't fail.  If the unfortunate doctor ends his move in a room with a person, the game immediately goes to that person's turn (breaking turn order- a key strategy employed to skip players).

Cards include 'failure cards'- these are NOT shuffled to make a new pile- murder weapon cards, and room cards.  Play a room card to move you or Doctor Lucky to that room.  Once the failure cards are used up, anyone who's able to make a murder attempt will be successful.  So ration them wisely!

Review
This game- basically inverse Clue- is pretty fun, if you can forget the overall goal of killing a person.  The theme aside, the mechanics are simple and strategy interesting.  You have to both position yourself to get the doctor alone, and prevent others from doing it, and get a weapon to increase your chances, but at a stage in the game where you have a chance to succeed . . . you get the point.

Rating: B

Sunday, February 9, 2020

The Mandalorian (Season 1)


When Disney+, a streaming service, launched a few months ago, much of the hype revolved around the new, live-action Star Wars television show available only on that platform: The Mandalorian.

It is the time of the New Republic, after the Empire has fallen in Return of the Jedi.  The Mandalorian is a bounty hunter who takes an assignment with an unexpected target: a baby.  After obtaining the child, the conflicted hunter- who was himself taken in as an orphan by Mandalorians- decides to keep the child and care for him, immediately incurring the wrath of a powerful ex-Imperial warlord.  Can Mando stay one step ahead- or will he now be the hunted forever?  And why is the baby so important?

After a series of misfires in the movies, Star Wars has a hit with The Mandalorian- largely because of the baby.  The same species as Yoda, this "baby Yoda" has been all over social media and the subject of much fanfare.  The series itself is pretty good- as a television show, it has a far smaller budget than the movies, and the difference in production quality is evident (and the relative lack of music bothered me at times- love those John Williams scores).  But the story is good- it has an 'old west' feel to it- and I'm intrigued to see where it will go in season 2.  It is good to finally see a live-action Star Wars show, after decades of discussion.
'baby Yoda'
Rating: A-

Saturday, February 8, 2020

Chariots of Fire


Chariots of Fire is the 1981 movie about two British runners in the 1924 Olympics: devout Christian Eric Liddell and Jew Harold Abrahams.  The former runs to the glory of God; the latter to prove himself.  Both approaches are examined in the film.

For Eric, it was all about God.  He was an excellent runner, and was told: "You're the proud possessor of many gifts, and its your sacred duty to put them to good use . . . Run in God's name, and let the world stand back and wonder."  He would do so- but he was conflicted, also feeling the call to be a missionary in China.  He'd solve the dilemma: "I believe that God made me for a purpose.  For China.  But he also made me fast, and when I run, I feel his pleasure.  To give that up would be to hold him in contempt."  And so he first focuses on the 1924 Olympics- but there's a problem.  The heats for his preferred race (100m) is on a Sunday- and he refuses to run on the Sabbath.  He thus changes to the 400m- a race he's not likely to win- and is victorious anyway (he set a world record, in fact).

For Harold, it was all about proving worth.  As a Jew, he was subject to frequent discrimination, and running made him feel worthy.  He's used to winning; in the film, his loss (early on to Liddell) was met with shock and fury.  He'd go on to win the 100m event at the Olympics. 

Harold's worth is bound in his achievement, while Liddell's achievements are because he was made worthy by God.  It's a notable difference, and produces two remarkably different temperaments.  Liddell would die in 1945 in occupied China of an illness at the end of WWII.

I got to see the film (again) on a plane; it had been years, but it's held up well.  The music is undoubtedly early '80s (heavy on the electronic sounds) but good nonetheless; the story is excellent and message right on.  Check this one out.

Rating: A

Friday, February 7, 2020

Modern Family


Modern Family is a 'mockumentary'-style comedy about, well, a family in modern times.  It follows three families:

- Jay Pritchett (the patriarch and founder of Closets Closets Closets) and his second wife Gloria (much younger and an immigrant) and her son Manny.
- The Dunphys- Claire (Jay's daughter and current CEO of the family business), Phil (realtor), and their children Haley (who loves boys and parties), Alex (who loves school), and Luke (the lovable idiot)
- Mitchell Pritchett (Jay's son and lawyer) and Cameron Tucker (teacher), a gay couple raising Lily, the daughter they adopted from Vietnam

We've watched all 9 seasons available on Netflix (the show ran 11 seasons total).  I think it's fantastic.  The writing is superb and the mockumentary style is a lot of fun.

Rating: A


Saturday, February 1, 2020

Brooklyn 99


Brooklyn 99 is a police comedy.  A team of carefree, quirky detectives in the 99th precinct solve crimes and keep Brooklyn safe in a whimsical, lighthearted way.

There are Detectives:
- Jake Peralta, the hard-working, insecure, Die Hard-loving clown
- Amy Santiago, the type-A uber-organized do-good
- Rosa Diaz, silent and deadly
- Charles Boyle, Jake's obsessed and clingy best friend
- Scully & Hitchcock, two obese do-nothings who have been on the force forever

Plus:
- Raymond Holt, stone-faced and stern captain
- Terry Jeffords, Muscle-bound Sergeant trying to keep the detectives in line
- Gina Linetti, the self-absorbed and poorly-performing administrative assistant

My wife and I just finished all five seasons available on Netflix (the show is currently on season 7).  It took a few episodes to grow on us, but it's great.  The personalities, each with their idiosyncrasies, play off each other in amusing ways.  The seasons have progressed with no noticeable change in quality; it's a lighthearted show that's always entertaining and occasionally laugh-out-loud funny.

Rating: A