Thursday, May 28, 2015

Dark Victory (Various)


In Dark Victory (the sequel to The Long Halloween), a strange new killer is on the loose.  The standard rogues gallery has been broken out of Arkham, the mob is recovering following their defeat in Halloween, and the newly-created Two-Face (formerly Harvey Dent) has escaped.  When someone starts killing cops on holidays, Gotham seems ready to fall apart at the seams.  Can Batman find this 'Holiday killer' before it's too late?  Or will going it alone prove too much to handle this time?

I enjoyed The Long Halloween, and Dark Victory is much in the same vein.  Same author/artist team, same general theme (a mystery woven over many issues), and same good storytelling.  Many rogues make an appearance, which is always fun, and we get introduced to the first Robin.  Overall, a good read.

Rating: A

Wednesday, May 27, 2015

The Rise of Theodore Roosevelt (Edmund Morris)


The Rise of Theodore Roosevelt, the first in a biographical trilogy by Edmund Morris, covers from Teddy's birth (1858) through Teddy's ascendancy to the Presidency (1901).  We learn about his personal life and political.

Personally, we learn:
- how he transformed himself through hard physical exertion from a sickly, asthmatic child to 'rugged' man, capable of impressive physical feats
- his love of nature/the wilderness
- his childhood in New York City (and travels to Europe)
- the college years at Harvard
- his first marriage (his wife, Alice, would later die after giving birth to his first child)
- his hunting trips and cattle ventures in the Dakota territory, and how he fell in love with the Badlands, west, and 'cowboy' image
- his second marriage (to Edith, which would produce five more children)
- his literary career (Roosevelt wrote dozens of books, about war, biographies, and accounts of the west)

Politically, we get overviews of his terms as:
- New York state assemblyman (1882-84)
- Civil Service Commissioner (1888-95)
- New York City Police Commissioner (1895-97)
- Assistant Secretary of the Navy (1897-98)
- Colonel in the Army, leading the 'Rough Riders' in the Spanish-American War (1898)
- Governor of New York (1898-1900)
- Vice President (1901)

Theodore Roosevelt was an impressive character.  This account, largely positive (though, admittedly, I've never seen a negative account of TR), shows just how impressive he was.  He read voraciously (several books a day), could absorb an amazing amount of information, trained himself to overcome his physical shortcomings, and took on corruption and the political machine of the day.  He was also a Renaissance man, learning about many things to include natural science, history, politics, cattle farming, hunting, military matters, and more.  He was larger-than-life in several respects.

This is a great read.  It won the Pulitzer; it's easy to see why.  Morris did an impressive amount of research, and writes very well.  I look forward to the other two books.

Rating: A

Saturday, May 23, 2015

Leadership


Several weeks ago, I attended a men's retreat through my Church.  The speaker at that event, Drew Derreth, gave a series of excellent talks on leadership.  Below is a summary.

Talk 1- The Path Leaders Take

The path leaders take is one from strength to weakness, from pride to humility, from trying to trusting.  Following a path to please God can, if we're not careful, turn into keeping God pleased, and become a treadmill of strength and trying to earn the impossible.  Grace flows downhill, and in the Bible, Samson, Gideon, David, and Jesus are all examples of how their ascent corresponded directly with a humbling descent (in their hearts)- a dying to self necessary (paradoxically) for life, and a learning to trust rather than to please.

Scriptures: 1 Corinthians 1:27, 2 Corinthians 12:9-10, Philippians 3:7-11

Talk 2- The Target Leaders Aim For
"What is the problem with the world?  I am." - G.K. Chesterton
Leaders should aim for the heart.  We need to change the root of the tree (or people) and not focus on the fruit.  People respond to events based on their heart/perception.  Leaders often focus on the response, but should focus on the heart, as that's what's driving the response.  Our hearts are either anchored in Christ (leading to change) or detestable things (leading to destruction).

Scriptures: Mark 7:14-23, Jeremiah 17:5-10, Ezekiel 11:19-21, Matthew 7:16-20, Psalm 51

Talk 3- A Case Study of the Heart

The heart is deceitful and wicked above all things.  We need to be mindful about this, and not trust in man but in the Lord.

Scriptures: Jeremiah 17:5-9

Talk 4- The Tools Leaders Use
"Start where you are.  Use what you have.  Do what you can." - Arthur Ashe
God uses the 'nobodies'- and leaders need much less than they think they need.  Every part, no matter how small, advances the mission; God can and does use an ass to speak every Sunday.  There are many needs in this world- God starts by raising leaders who see the need (simply identifying the need may be an indication that you should lead an effort to fill it).  As we proceed, however, we must keep our focus- if we lose sight of who God is or who we are, we start to distort everything.

Scripture: Matthew 18

Talk 5- Sunday Worship

In the sermon's Scripture passage (John 5- Jesus talking to a woman at a well), Jesus crosses natural (gender, national, ethnic, moral) barriers to exalt the marginalized and outcast.  The heart of a leader considers people- especially the outcasts.  Jesus sees through physical need to true spiritual need.  The Gospel has a bipolar nature to it- we both grab it and push it away at the same time.  Peter does this in Luke 5, the woman does it in John 5, and it shows both our need and our hearts (as we recognize a need but desire to fill it in our own way- which ultimately cannot satisfy).

Scripture: John 5, Luke 5

Thoughts

This talk was just what I needed.  I've read a fair number of leadership books (Christian and secular), and they all go quickly to action- "do this, not that."  This series of talks took a step back and looked and the foundation and heart of the matter.  To be effective as leaders, we need to learn that it's not about us, and the more we grow, the more we'll be required to lessen- to sacrifice ourselves.  Our focus should not be on behaviors but on the heart that produces them, and we need to start where we are- and not wait for some ill-defined point in our future- and do what we can with what we have.  In all, I came away humbled and saddened for how wrong my focus in leadership had become. May mine be a godly grief, which produces repentance, and not a worldly grief, which produces death (2 Corinthians 7:10).

Wednesday, May 20, 2015

Iron Man


Shame on me;  I've reviewed many superhero movies to date, but I've missed some of the 'core' films in the genre.  I start to rectify that here.

Released in 2008, Iron Man is the origin tale of the title hero (and, incidentally, kicked off Phase 1 of the Marvel Cinematic Universe).  In it, we see Tony Stark go from self-absorbed hedonist to hero intent on using his genius and fortune for good.  The catalyst to his transformation was being captured and held hostage by terrorists, almost losing his life to shrapnel, and learning that his captors had somehow obtained his Stark Industry weapons.  As Tony develops his new persona, he learns that another threat may in fact be controlling the terrorists- a threat that may cost him his life.

The movie was well-received, and deservedly so.  The pacing is good, as is the acting (Robert Downey Jr. is amazing), effects, and overall premise.  The humor is especially good, and makes for an entertaining ride.  Featuring more story and less action than recent Marvel films, I found watching this a refreshing change of pace from the modern overstuffed superhero offerings.

Rating: A

Tuesday, May 19, 2015

The River of Doubt (Candice Millard)


The River of Doubt recounts Theodore Roosevelt's mapping of a previously unexplored river in South America following his election defeat in 1912.  Ultimately lasting months, costing lives, and bringing Roosevelt to the brink of suicide, the journey of over more than one thousand miles of river proved to be more than anybody bargained for.  The ill-prepared expedition encountered disease, deadly animals, swarms of insects, hostile natives, unknown plants, unforgiving climate, deadly rapids, near-starvation, and more as they battled against the unrelenting terrors of the Amazon rainforest.  Would Roosevelt survive?  History, of course, shows that he did.

Having previously read (and enjoyed) Millard's book about Garfield (reviewed here), I was excited for this one.  It didn't disappoint, though it wasn't quite up to par with her prior book.  The River of Doubt was informative, well-written, and exciting; on the downside, it got monotonous (the same challenges kept presenting themselves- over and over and over), seemed overly dramatic in places, and provided a lot of background about things that could detract from the main story- like facts about impressive rainforest ecosystem interrelationships, a short history of Indian tribal relations, or discussions of the continent's formation.  It is good, in the end, and interesting- just not as spellbinding as I had hoped.

Rating: A-

Sunday, May 17, 2015

Basic Christianity (John Stott)


I've been a Christian for 28 years and have read the entire Bible in at least five different translations (KJV, NKJV, NIV, NASB, ESV), but it never hurts to revisit the basics.  In Basic Christianity, famous English theologian John Stott does just that.  In four parts, he lays out:

- Who Christ Is (the claims, character, and resurrection of Christ)
- What We Need (the fact, nature, and consequences of sin)
- What Christ Has Done (the death and salvation of Christ)
- How To Respond (counting the cost, reaching a decision, being a Christian)

Stott makes a number of great points here.  There are a lot of misconceptions about Christianity today (some of it brought on by certain Churches, admittedly), and I recommend Basic Christianity to Christians and non who want to understand what it's really about.  Check it out- you may be surprised.

Rating: A

Sunday, May 10, 2015

God Loves, Man Kills (Various)


The story upon which the movie X-Men 2 was partially based, God Loves, Man Kills is the story of Reverend Stryker and his quest to eradicate mutants from the Earth.  To recruit assistance and validate his endeavor, he launches a 'crusade' to publicly proclaim the abomination and menace he believes mutants are and hold for humanity, respectively.  Little does the crowd know, though, that Stryker has captured Professor X and intends to use his mutant powers to destroy the rest of the X-men . . . will he succeed?

I was attracted to this book because of the title, which I believe neatly sums up reality.  I also enjoyed X-men 2 and so wanted to read the source material.  I wasn't disappointed; God Loves, Man Kills is a good book.  The story is compelling, though it bothered me that the Reverend so twisted Scripture (regrettably, that's not uncommon in the real world, too).  I enjoyed seeing the mutants (my personal favorite, Nightcrawler, features heavily here) and Magneto team up to counter Stryker's threat.  The book was very short, so it wasn't as epic as I had hoped, but it is a worthy read nonetheless.

Rating: A-

Friday, May 8, 2015

The Reality of Leadership


Criticizing those above us- be it parents, bosses, or politicians- is a common activity.  If someone's in a position of power, we're full of opinions about how he or she should run things.  We're quick to judge and slow to empathize- we've all done it.

One year ago today, I became a manager after fourteen years as an engineer.  I came in ready to take charge and be a good leader.  I had read many books, seen many examples, and believed I knew what it took.  I'd show 'em- this was going to be easy.

As you can probably guess, it hasn't worked out quite that way.  As the saying goes, if you want to develop empathy, walk a mile in someone else's shoes.  My first year in leadership has had its share of ups and downs, of joys and trials.  Today's post reflects on elements of being in charge that I've found difficult or surprising.  If you aspire to lead and/or believe your current manager is a buffoon, perhaps the below will provide a sobering perspective.

Leadership is . . . 

1. A different perspective

As an engineer, it was my job to know my specific area well.  As a leader, I'm now required to know many areas at a high level.  That breadth of awareness inherently changes perspective.  As a result, many of my previously-held beliefs (on how to approach corporate strategy, personnel decisions, or program management) have gone out the window.  Actions that made sense and worked well for my specific area may make little or no sense across the board.  My view has changed, and my actions and beliefs have had to change right along with it to be an effective leader.

I wish I understood that when I was at the working level, just like I wish my employees knew that now.  More than a few of their concerns have come down to not having the same broad view- they see only their area, and disregard those around them.

2. A lonely endeavor

"To bear a ring of power is to be alone."  - Fellowship of the Ring

I'm a low-level leader, but I still have a degree of power, and power always alienates.  I don't throw my weight around, but that's irrelevant- because I hold power, there is an inherent difference between my employees and me.  I am management- I'm "one of them."  Contrast this to prior working-level positions, where I would laugh or curse together with my colleagues about our jobs or life in general.  Now, I spend most of my time interacting with people whom I cannot befriend.  I like them- I want to befriend them- but the nature of the working relationship deems that unwise.  This is my biggest sadness in leadership.

3. Elusive to gauge

As an engineer, my enjoyment of work was often directly derived from the value I felt I provided.  And, in most cases, it was easy to quantify what that value was.  I produced X widgets, fixed Y gadgets, or developed Z concepts that improved our operations and satisfied our customers.  I slept easy at night, knowing I was earning my pay and making life better.

As a leader, I'm finding that my value is much more difficult to quantify.  My employees are all skilled- when I'm out for the day, they don't sit there listlessly, with vacant expressions in their eyes, awaiting my return.  They get along just fine without me.  I don't know if my actions inspire, encourage, or assist them.  There are some times when my value is shown, but mostly I have no idea if I'm helping them or not.  I've spoken to several senior executives about this, and their answers were the same- and the higher up you go, the harder it gets to determine value.  Ouch.

4. A messy affair

"Some men aren't looking for anything logical, like money.  They can't be bought, bullied, reasoned, or negotiated with."  - The Dark Knight

When I was an engineer, I worked with things that operated in accordance with strict, unchanging laws.  If the gadget was broken, there was a reason why, and systematic study would reveal the cause (and point to the fix).

As a leader, my job is people.  People, rather obviously, are not machines.  No two work the same way; motivations, actions, and reactions are intensely different from person to person (or even in the same person depending on the day).  There is no formula- what motivates Dave will hinder Suzy; What helps Pam might hurt Samuel.  Each person is unique, and must be treated as such.  With dozens of employees, it's hard to know how to best help/motivate each individual except through observation and a lot of trial and error.  One person will love my approach, and another will despise it.  Leadership, it turns out, is a rather messy affair.

5. A humbling challenge

Everyone makes mistakes.  As an engineer, though, my mistakes were often with systems- I entered a wrong command, forgot a cable, or drew a schematic incorrectly.  The system didn't care or judge me for it.  In addition, my mishaps were often in private (or with a small group of people)- and I could fix them with minimal embarrassment.

Now, my job is people, and that means my mistakes are with people.  Since people are complicated and react differently (see previous point), that means I mess up a lot more now, and often my mistakes are rather public.  They can also be harder to fix (especially if I unknowingly alienated or hurt someone); It's easier to repair a bridge than a psyche.

6. An exercise in reliance

I used to be the guy who had the info and did great things.  I was responsible for knowing the technology, doing the job well, and explaining it.  Now, I'm the guy who needs the info and watches good things; I am utterly reliant upon my people.  Their accomplishments and knowledge are what will win the day- not mine.  I thought I could fight this, but I was wrong.  When I became a manager, I vowed to learn each technical area as well as I knew my own.  I was going to do it all.  It's an impossible endeavor, of course, as I've since found- there are too many things to know in too much detail.  I was like an orchestra conductor trying to learn every instrument at an expert level, rather than focusing on the music at large and directing the ensemble.  Leadership is an exercise in reliance; I must rely on my people.  It's no longer about me, and it's very hard to 'let go' of personal accomplishment.

7. A worthy occupation

If you've read thus far, you may think I'm not enjoying leadership, or that I regret my decision to become a manager.  Not so!  Yes, the above realities are difficult . . . but every job has its ups and downs.  In the end, what I like about leadership is the ability to help others.  To provide clear vision, direction, and delineation of responsibility; to handle conflicts and mentor; to foster environments of open communication and respect; to be an examples; these are worthy endeavors.  My team is excellent, and makes every day fun; it is I who am the problem.  For, in the end, leadership is about dying to self, and lifting up those around you regardless of personal cost.  Every fiber of my being fights such self-sacrifice, which is why the above challenges bother me so, but to live- or lead- one must first die.

Thursday, May 7, 2015

Avengers: Age of Ultron


Here we are again.  Three years ago, the first Avengers movie came out (review here) and set box office records as it culminated Phase One of the Marvel Cinematic Universe.  Since then, several other Marvel films have appeared (Iron Man 3, Thor 2, Captain America 2, and Guardians of the Galaxy) to set the stage for Avengers: Age of Ultron.  This time, our heroes must band together to confront a new kind of foe, bent on destroying the Earth and aided by super-villains.  Will the ensemble's second go-round meet the impossibly-high expectations set for it?

Alas, Age of Ultron misses the mark.  There's too much action and insufficient or rushed dialogue, plot development and character growth.  I was left mystified more than once as things happened with little or no explanation.  The plot was 'blah' at best and confusing at worst- the general point appears to be 'look, it's the Avengers!  Yay!'  The humor element, a strength in the first film, wasn't as good here, and in general, the film suffers from the now-common 'overstuffing' of superhero films.  It tries to do too much, say too much, introduce too much, 'wow' too much.  It is undeniably entertaining, but only because it has 8+ superheroes zooming around and shaking things up.  I will own it, because I have a little boy inside that just wants to see Hulk smashing up cities- but the older me will sigh at what might have been.

Rating: B

Sunday, May 3, 2015

William Shakespeare's Star Wars (Ian Doescher)


William Shakespeare's Star Wars is the brainchild of author Ian Doescher, who has released three titles to date (and has three more in the works).  The premise is simple: translate the Star Wars movies into Elizabethan English- the language of Shakespeare's day.  I read 25% of Doescher's first release, Verily, A New Hope, and was amused . . . but not enough to finish it, nor read any others.

I love Star Wars; I just don't feel the need to have it infiltrate all of life.  Books like this are unnecessary- if you like the Bard, read him.  If you like Star Wars, watch it.  Yes, the same tale told in different styles can be a fun experience, and seeing a modern movie script translated into Shakespearean verse is interesting.  But it wasn't that fun, nor that interesting.  At least, not enough to warrant six books.  After ~40 pages, I had my fill, and saw no need to continue.  Recommended for the die-hard only.

Rating: C+