In January, I read (and loved) Alexandre Dumas' The Count of Monte Cristo (review here). In 2002, that 1000-page book was turned into a 2-hour movie of the same name. How did it compare?
In my experience, the book is almost always better than the movie- often, it's much better. In this case, I wondered how would they handle the significant abridgements necessary to fit the story into two hours. In the beginning of the movie, I was pleasantly surprised. They seem to get events and characters pretty close to Dumas' version- up to the point when Dantes escapes prison. From then on, the revenge sequence is hopelessly condensed and markedly lacks the interest, complexity, build-up, and satisfaction of the novel. Some deviations are pretty significant departures from the plot and tone of the book, which I found most disturbing. On its own, the film stands out as a reasonable adventure/thriller. Compared to the book on which it is based, it lacks heavily. I suspect a more faithful treatment could come only in the form of a TV mini-series.
Rating: B-
No comments:
Post a Comment